Discusión de alineamientos absolutos

Qué es Evil?

"Evil implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient."



*Dañar por placer simplemente.

*No ayudar no es Evil, sino Chaotic (Siempre que tenga posibilidades y no represente riesgo mayor para sí mismo).

*Causar daño permanente e irreversible a quien no te agrede.

*Esclavizar, privar de la libertad, cometer injusticia.

*Sobreponer el beneficio propio sobre cualquier otro aspecto de manera que perjudique a otros.










Qué es Good?

"Good implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of the sentient beings. Good characters make personal sacrifices to help others."


*Ayudar a desconocidos sin beneficio alguno.
*Preservar la vida y la paz ante todo.






Qué es Chaotic?

*"Follow their consciences, resent beign told what to do, favor new ideas over tradition, and do what they promise if they feel like it"

*"On the downside, chaos can include recklessness, resentment toward legitimate authority, arbitrary actions, and irresponsability."

*No cumplir promesas
*Desafiar a una autoridad
*No hacerse responsable de sus actos










Qué es Lawful?

*"Tell the truth, keep their word, respect authority, honor tradition and judge those who fall short of their duties"

*"On the downside, lawfulness can include close-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgementalness, and lack of adaptability"


*Respaldar las tradiciones
*Juzgar severamente a quien no cumple con su deber







Neutral:

"People who are neutral with respect to good and evil have compunctions against killing the innocent but lack the commitment to make sacrifices to protect or help others"

"A neutral person may sacrifice himself to protect his family or even his homeland, but he would not do so for strangers who are not related to him."


"Someone who is neutral with respect to law and chaos has a normal respect for authority and feels neither a compulsion to obey nor a compulsion to rebel. She is honest but can be tempted into lying or deceiving others."


"Neutral undecided: A neutrla character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn't feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs chaos. Most neutral characters exhibit lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil-after all, she woudl rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still she's not personally commited to upholding good in any abstract or universal way."

"Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run."




Neutral undecided: Tal cosa no es TN (True neutral) para mí. El "valeverguismo" o la indiferencia no es TN. A nadie le puede ser totalmente indiferente la vida misma sin recaer en la negligencia; la negligencia, el abandono, la tibieza, la ambivalencia son, para mí, características caóticas, inestables y por tanto conflictivas como casi todos los aspectos del caos. Alguien que se deja llevar por la corriente o simplemente no siente inclinación por algún bando, crea el caos, es un agente de entropía por omisión. Contrario al TN que está comprometido al equilibrio a toda costa, el "Neutral undecided", ó como yo lo llamo "el valeverga", simplemente sigue a lo que las masas o la conveniencia (sin caer en NE) sin bandera alguna. Si alguien, en mi campaña, toma tal actitud, tendrá puntos de CN.